Beyond Reasonable Doubt
The beyond reasonable doubt is very crucial before the
release of the verdict of the judge to the allegedly responsible of the crime.
A belief that should proven that there is no small remaining doubt due to the
releasing of judge decision is the most important either the suspected criminal
is guilty or not.
If the jury released the decision that the allegedly
criminal was guilty does it mean that the criminal is convicted beyond
reasonable doubt which means that the suspected criminal is the real creator of
the crime?
The evidences are the tools those helps the jury to convince
him/her that the person that charge of an offense/crime was the responsible of
that crime.
Here are some little
explanation about the beyond reasonable doubt for better comprehension. Here is
(are) the few scenario(s)
A, is an allegedly criminal, he was charged of rape with homicide as crimes against person. The evidence was the witness, DNA, the
corpus delicti and the corpus delicti evidence was proven that there was crime
committed in the particular area.
The primary suspect of the case was the A and A was detained
and waits his trial. When in his trial, the evidence DNA was mismatch to the
suspected criminal and the witness proven by the defendant that not reliable to
become a witness due to some contradictions to the testimony in court before and
there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the A was the real creator of
the crime.
The contradiction of the testimony of the witness makes the
jury doubt that there is something not right and the DNA was mismatched to the
suspected criminal.
In this case, the defendant’s party files the demurrer of
evidence due to insufficient of evidence.
The court upon discretion without
filing of demurrer of evidence in court shall dismiss the case motu proprio and
those evidences against to the defendant cannot convince the court beyond
reasonable doubt.
Another example about the offense filed by A against B due
to the killing of C. the case was murder due to the qualifying circumstances
qualifies that the case should murder. The evidences were slug or known as bullet,
caliber 0.45 pistol determined as instrument that used in the commission of the
crime. There is witness available and paraffin test was proven that the
allegedly criminal was fired a gun.
The witness is reliable and no contradiction in the statement,
the due process was properly executed. The right of the accused was mentioned
to the defendant of the case. In this instances, the court upon the discretion
fells that the suspected criminal was guilty beyond reasonable doubt due to the
evidences, witness and more.
The verdict might guilty for sure due to the court was
convinced through evidence and other circumstances that the suspected criminal
is the real creator of the crime.
The beyond reasonable doubt is the most important factor to
determine that the defendant of the case is guilty, if the evidence is weak and
no sufficient power to convince the jury, in that instances cannot prove beyond
reasonable doubt and the defendant will acquit.
No comments:
Post a Comment