Shoot to Kill Interpretation and When to Use for Legality

Shoot to Kill

Shoot to kill is an order from the court and other authorities made by law. The last resort of the nation in case there is war between the rebels, terrorists, and criminal activities by ordinary people. The shoot to kill order might only exist if there was capital punishment in the particular country and the capital punishment defined as death penalty. If the nations have no capital punishment, shoot to kill might impossible to exist due to the shoot to kill is violation of the human rights.
shoot to kill

Even the criminal, terrorist and other evil humans still humans and have rights to live in this world and the human right is irrevocable that no one can bend, even the existing law and possible to exist never became official law if violated the constitutional rights. But in some instances, the shoot to kill prevails in the laws for the people in the country.

Christian country might not permit the shoot to kill but some authorities killed the person and disseminated the wrong information in the public about the real incident due to for example the terrorists: the terrorists, these people are highly dangerous and should eliminate in the world, if not, the big problem waits in the society made by these people.

Even the country has no capital punishment, due to they are highly dangerous people, some authorities used some clear method to eliminate these people even these people were on the custody in the authorities and pretends those they ambushed in the road ways and the likes but they intentionally killed it for the safety of all citizen in these type of people who does economic sabotage in almost countries.

We cannot blame if the authorities killed them intentionally. If there are laws those existed to kill the terrorists, shoot to kill, so we cannot blame those laws due to those people killed innocent people and no governments permitted the killings that can be considered as mass killing but not genocide.

So, when the shoot to kill is legal even there was no law that permits the killing and even there was law that prohibits the shoot to kill?

The excellent example for this if the nation is in the course of war between the government’s agents like military, police and other armed bodies against to the terrorists and rebel groups; if the terrorist/ rebel groups attacked the particular place in the country like in the Marawi city in the Philippines, after they attacked, the government of this country responded in that situation and repealed those people. 

If those people surrendered, might their life remains in them but they done their acts with courage and bravery until their last breath.

In this case, the Philippines have no choice but eliminate those people who were received false doctrine and have corrupted principle. The people who attacked the Marawi city are the combination of Maute brothers; Isis and Abu Sayyaf group, but the popular is the Maute – Isis Group as the name of their group.

No one can caught these type of people unless their life should put into end through iron hand; there are many civilians, Philippine National Police personnel and Arm Forces of the Philippines lost their lives by this incident that created historical events both in mind, in heart and in the country of the Filipinos and their acts in order to eliminate the evilness those done by the Maute – ISIS group, they used the idea of shoot to kill.


No laws can prevent the shoot to kill in this event and we can use these manners in this type of situation to fit the idea of shoot to kill. 

No comments:

Comments

3-comments