Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Damage to Property Explanation

Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Damage to Property

The reckless imprudence resulting in damage to property is a case that charge to the person due to recklessness and the recklessness resulted into damage of property of other people. The property defined as all things which own by person like car, pet, houses, bar, buildings and the likes. There is no limitation in terms of property, therefore don’t limit yourself to the definition of property.

If the recklessness killed the pet of other people, might cover with this law that defined on the criminal code on your country; same with the houses, buildings, cars and the likes.

If anyone destroyed the above mentioned and same properties shall liable to the law that defined on the above.  Even in what means of destruction that resulted into the damage of the property of other people; still the case that needs to charge to the person is the reckless imprudence resulting in damage to property.

This type of case might has penalty of restoration, reparation and just the civil code might prevail if the law has provision in this case. Common that govern with this law was the criminal code and the punishment is the same to the civil code.

Even there was collision occurred between the two cars if there were no involvement of the human life, this case is fit for that incident, if there was life involve with collision, might the case is reckless imprudence resulting to homicide and multiple homicide if there are many life involve with the collision.

Same with the reckless imprudence resulting to serious physical injury, slight or less serious if the consequence of the collision were injury and injuries if more. Some might the collision might did with intentional and if the consequence of the incident proves that the act was intentional, the possible case is murder if one, if more, the case is multiple murder and double murder if the victims were two.

Some wicked in order for them to hide their intention, used some diversion tactics to mislead the investigator of the case. Their intention is to kill the other people either from indirect execution or direct execution. The direct execution of crime is referring to the execution of the malefactor without hiring in someone and the indirect execution is a type of execution through hiring of person to kill the enemy.

However, if the incidents prove that the act was intentional, should have evidence to prove that the act was murder beyond reasonable doubt. Might the circumstantial evidence is useful in this case and the corpus delicti evidence should prove first.

The reason that after the collision; the two cars were not removed immediately for measurement if needed and investigation to determine by the investigator of the case whether who caused the collision or the reason of the collision of the two vehicles on the road ways.

 After the collision happened, the possible that may happen is the traffic congestion and the investigation should resolve as soon as possible for the users of the road ways.